urmadmin, Author at Unstoppable Recording Machine - Page 39 of 45

Eyal Levi: Finishing your music, acoustic treatment, and landing the Audio Hammer gig

Eyal Levi is a producer, engineer, and co-founder of URM Academy and Nail The Mix. As the guitarist for the band Dååth, he was deeply embedded in the metal scene before transitioning to a full-time production role at the legendary Audio Hammer Studios alongside Jason Suecof and Mark Lewis. He’s worked on acclaimed albums for bands like The Black Dahlia Murder, August Burns Red, Whitechapel, Chelsea Grin, and Trivium.

In This Episode

In the very first “Dear Eyal” Q&A session, Eyal Levi tackles some of the most common hurdles producers face. He kicks things off by addressing creative self-doubt, offering some real-talk advice on how to stop hoarding audio and actually finish your damn projects by adopting a “fuck it” mentality. Next, he dives into the practicalities of room treatment, breaking down the DIY vs. pre-made debate, explaining the basic principles of acoustic treatment, and warning against the common pitfalls of using cheap foam. To wrap it up, Eyal shares the full story of how he landed his gig at Audio Hammer Studios, detailing how a five-year friendship built on genuine networking—not just transactional asks—led to a life-changing opportunity. He also recounts some incredible memories, from having Colin Richardson track Trivium in his drum room to recording one of his all-time favorite bands, The Black Dahlia Murder.

Products Mentioned

Timestamps

  • [1:37] How to overcome self-doubt with your personal work
  • [3:36] Adopting a “fuck it” mentality to finish projects
  • [4:19] What’s the worst that can happen if a client dislikes your mix?
  • [5:43] Using Nail The Mix deadlines to build confidence and finish tracks
  • [7:22] Why hoarding audio and working on one song for too long hurts your progress
  • [9:12] Room Treatment: DIY vs. buying pre-made panels
  • [10:24] The problem with working in an untreated room
  • [11:30] Why Eyal recommends buying panels if you can’t build them
  • [12:35] Room treatment basics: reflection points, bass traps, and ceiling clouds
  • [15:35] Why you should avoid using acoustic foam by itself
  • [17:30] The Great White club fire and the dangers of acoustic foam
  • [18:49] How Eyal landed the job at Audio Hammer Studios
  • [19:40] The importance of building genuine, long-term relationships (networking)
  • [23:00] How a crisis in his band Dååth led to the Audio Hammer opportunity
  • [25:00] Memorable experience #1: Colin Richardson tracking Trivium drums
  • [26:12] Memorable experience #2: Earning Jason Suecof’s trust on the Demon Hunter mix
  • [27:20] Memorable experience #3: Recording drums for The Black Dahlia Murder

GREGORY SCOTT: Analog vs. Digital Philosophy, Using Faders for Groove, Making Digital Feel Analog

Gregory Scott is the founder and product designer behind Kush Audio and Sly-Fi Digital, creating some of the most unique and vibey hardware and software in pro audio. Known for his “Pragmatic Snob” philosophy, Gregory has developed a dedicated following for his musical tools, including the distinctive Clariphonic and Electra EQs, the versatile Tweaker compressor, and the beloved UBK-1 plugin, which captures the magic of his famed UBK Fatso hardware modification.

In This Episode

Kush Audio founder Gregory Scott drops by for an incredibly nerdy deep dive into the art of sound. He explains his core design philosophy: analog is best at adding things to a sound, while digital excels at taking things away. Gregory gets into the weeds on why plugins still can’t quite capture the transient behavior and non-linear “living” quality of analog circuits, offering a killer tip on using saturation to make digital compressors feel more responsive. He also shares a life-changing story from his time with mixer Michael Brauer, revealing how the top pros use faders and compression not just for level control, but as an instrument to create movement, density, and groove. This one’s packed with technical insights and creative philosophy that will make you rethink your relationship with your tools, whether they’re in a rack or on your screen.

Products Mentioned

Timestamps

  • [7:58] His “Pragmatic Snob” philosophy and why he embraced making plugins
  • [10:33] The concept behind Sly-Fi Digital: emulating his own circuit-bent gear
  • [13:05] Gregory’s core philosophy: analog adds things, digital takes things away
  • [14:27] Why plugins still struggle to accurately capture analog’s transient behavior
  • [17:06] The importance of collaboration and knowing when to delegate
  • [22:12] Why even perfectly matched plugin and hardware compressors can feel totally different
  • [24:46] How analog gear alters transients even when no processing is engaged
  • [26:23] Tip: Use saturation plugins before digital compressors for a more analog feel
  • [28:36] A deep dive into the non-linear behavior of analog compressor release circuits
  • [39:26] A life-changing lesson learned from watching Michael Brauer “play” the faders
  • [40:47] Using faders to create rhythms and movement with elements buried in the mix
  • [48:27] The design process behind the Electra EQ: creating a tool that sounds like music, not frequencies
  • [54:34] The one piece of gear that still mystifies him: the API 525 compressor
  • [58:19] A go-to tracking setting for the Kush Tweaker
  • [59:43] His “eureka moment” with compressors: using them to define movement and groove
  • [1:01:27] A practical exercise for learning how to hear a compressor’s movement
  • [1:14:02] Advice for aspiring gear designers: Execution and relationships trump ideas

ANDY JAMES: Winning Nail the Mix, Recording Tight Guitars, and the Real Secret to Networking

Andy James is a prolific UK-based guitarist known for his incredible technical skill and melodic sensibilities. He has released four solo albums and recorded four albums with the band Sacred Mother Tongue, and currently plays in a new project called Wearing Scars. A respected educator, he has created a vast amount of content for Lick Library and runs his own popular online school, the Andy James Guitar Academy. He is also a winner of the URM Nail the Mix competition, taking the top spot for his mix of the Papa Roach song “Face Everything and Rise.”

In This Episode

Guitar virtuoso Andy James drops in to chat about his unexpected journey from being a touring musician to becoming a Nail the Mix champion. He shares the full story of how a serious health scare led him to dive headfirst into mixing as a form of therapy, and he breaks down the techniques he used on his winning Papa Roach mix—from completely rebuilding the drum track with samples to tackling lead vocals for the first time. Andy also gets into the weeds on his guitar-centric philosophies, discussing how to record ultra-tight rhythms, why midrange is the key to a great solo tone, and the importance of writing melodic parts that even non-musicians can connect with. Beyond the technical talk, he shares some killer insights on building a career, networking by just being a cool person to hang with, and adapting to the ever-changing music industry.

Products Mentioned

Timestamps

  • [0:03:44] Andy’s early disinterest in the recording process
  • [0:05:39] Learning to record tight guitars from producer Scott Atkins
  • [0:07:48] How Killswitch Engage was his proper introduction to modern metal
  • [0:12:02] The technique of playing one riff to a click for a minute straight to lock it in
  • [0:15:13] How his producer pushed him to play more exciting and unexpected solos
  • [0:21:16] Finding your own voice by listening to music outside your main genre
  • [0:28:54] How a near-death experience led him to get obsessed with mixing
  • [0:32:16] His approach to his winning Nail The Mix entry for Papa Roach
  • [0:35:05] Recreating the entire drum track with Drumforge and samples
  • [0:42:21] How dissecting player styles for Lick Library trained his ear for mixing
  • [0:49:32] Why it’s so much harder to mix your own music
  • [0:54:16] The key to a great solo guitar tone: midrange and not too much gain
  • [1:01:00] His process for writing solos by improvising hundreds of takes
  • [1:04:33] His new signature Dunlop pick that helps him play without warming up
  • [1:08:47] Details on his go-to EMG pickups
  • [1:12:16] How to write melodic shred solos that appeal to non-musicians
  • [1:27:54] The real secret to networking: just be a normal person people want to hang out with
  • [1:37:30] Why success ultimately boils down to how hard you’re willing to work

Jens Bogren: Building His Studio Empire, Hybrid Mixing Workflow, Go-To Signal Chains

A true titan of modern metal production, Jens Bogren is the man behind the board for some of the genre’s most iconic albums. From his world-class Fascination Street Studios in Sweden, he has shaped the sound of bands like Opeth (on seminal records like Ghost Reveries and Watershed), At The Gates, Arch Enemy, Between the Buried and Me, Kreator, and Devin Townsend. His signature style blends massive, modern punch with a natural, dynamic feel that always serves the song.

→ Get his plugins, samples and more at Bogren Digital

→ Check out his course, “How It’s Done w/ Jens Bogren“

In This Episode

Jens Bogren hangs out with the guys to talk shop, tracing his path from teaching sound engineering to building his own studio empire. He gets into the nitty-gritty of why hard work, luck, and timing were all crucial to his success, and how a key recommendation led to his breakthrough gig with Katatonia. For all the gearheads, Jens breaks down his hybrid workflow, explaining why he commits to his analog chains early and which pieces of outboard he still can’t live without. He shares his philosophy on achieving huge, modern drum sounds while keeping them feeling real, starting with the source recording and using samples for support, not as a crutch. Plus, he drops some serious knowledge in a rapid-fire round, detailing his go-to signal chains for everything from snare drums and heavy guitars to screamed vocals and acoustics. This episode is packed with practical wisdom and technical details from a master of the craft.

Products Mentioned

Timestamps

  • [6:52] The history of Fascination Street Studios
  • [10:47] Jens’ early career and the transition to full-time producer
  • [15:05] The formula for success: luck, timing, and talent
  • [16:04] How working with Katatonia became his first big break
  • [18:28] The importance of working insane hours when you’re starting out
  • [22:01] Why the Opeth album “Ghost Reveries” was a career turning point
  • [23:48] Adapting his production style for bands with different levels of creative vision
  • [27:25] Jens’ hybrid workflow and why he commits to hardware processing early on
  • [31:11] The reason he started mastering his own mixes
  • [34:18] His philosophy on getting natural yet modern drum sounds
  • [37:04] Rapid Fire: Snare drum recording chain
  • [38:32] Rapid Fire: Room mic techniques, including using reflection filters on cymbals
  • [40:29] Rapid Fire: His meticulous process for miking a guitar cab
  • [44:15] Rapid Fire: Vocal recording chain and when to use an SM7 vs. a U 47
  • [48:55] How to edit and mix intense, fast double-kick drums without creating mud
  • [53:09] Mixing dense, complex arrangements and why you should avoid the solo button
  • [59:37] His take on stereo bass and when (or when not) to use it
  • [1:05:05] Advice for up-and-coming engineers

Common Mixing Mistakes (Volume 1)

Common Mixing Mistakes (Volume 1) 

Mixing is a rather tricky business…

The thing is, if you’ve been at it for a while, it’s fairly easy to forget that there’s actually a pretty steep learning curve to overcome when you first start out. Remember, certain things which may seem “blatantly obvious” or “common sense” to you at this point probably took you years to realise/come across as a newcomer!

The truth is, a lot of the “eureka” moments we have throughout our mixing careers are the result of making mistakes until somebody points them out to us and then learning from said mistakes. This series of Blogs aims to point out some of these “not-so-obvious” common mistakes which even experienced engineers tend to make in the studio and hopefully help you course-correct as early-on as possible.

Here are a couple of common mistakes to watch out for the next time you sit down to mix:

Mistake #1 – Monitoring Too Loud

monitoring too loud

Don’t get fooled by the hype!

Believe it or not, the levels you monitor at while mixing can have a huge influence on the various balancing decisions you make during the process. If done carelessly, something that seems as mundane and simple as setting your listening volume can potentially result in a handful of issues further down the line.

Here are a few reasons why you should consider turning it down:

A – Loud Sounds Better… NOT!

There’s a valid reason why people on the audio forums and YouTube comment section get so worked up about before/after volume matching in plugin demos: OUR EARS PERCEIVE LOUDER AS BETTER.

For this exact reason we can easily get tricked into thinking the mix we’ve been working on with the speakers cranked sounds killer, when in reality we’ve probably missed the mark completely…

Don’t just take my word for it, multiple grammy award-winning engineer Chris Lord Alge is well known for avidly preaching the same advice:

“Monitoring is everything, cranking it up vs. listening to it low will give a different result to your mix. The important thing is to find the lowest volume that you feel you can balance the song at and stick with that.”

Check out the full SonicScoop interview here – https://vimeo.com/39245580

SonicScoop’s Power Sessions: Chris Lord-Alge – Part 3 “The Anthemic CLA Mix” from SonicScoop on Vimeo.

B – Ear Fatigue:

Another detrimental (and eventually serious) side-effect of listening at higher volumes for prolonged periods of time is ear fatigue. If left unchecked, this practice can lead to several issues in both the short, and the long run:

  • The short run: In my own experience, a specific balance I’ve made after listening at higher volumes for a long time will almost always need a substantial revision the next day when listened back with fresh ears.
  • It’s also fairly likely that I’ve removed too much of the high-mids around 2-3kHz in the process. My ears slowly become more sensitive to this frequency range throughout the day.
  • The long run: Our ears are very sensitive things, bombarding them with mid-heavy walls of distorted guitars and blast beats for hours on end, day after day can really take it’s toll over the years.

For these reasons I usually try and hold back for as long as possible before testing if my mixes are bangin’ at louder volumes. Sticking to this level of restraint can produce instant results in the form of allowing for longer mixing hours without any noticeable fatigue.

Give it a go!

Monitoring Too Loud Conclusion:

If you want a successful and long-lasting career in audio production then the answer is simple: YOU NEED TO PRESERVE YOUR HEARING! This isn’t something you can afford to brush to the side and worry about when you’re older. By then it’ll probably be too late.

Mistake #2 – Mixing To Your Monitoring/Room

3-mixing-to-your-monitoring

Think your mixes sound great? Think again…

I was recently clearing out some unused gear from my studio and picking out pieces to potentially sell off on eBay. One thing I came across was a pair of Sony MDR-7506 headphones which I formerly used for monitoring while playing drums live.

In order to determine if the headphones were still in good working condition I decided to plug them in and listen with some of my go-to reference mixes. My first reaction upon hitting play was something along of the lines of: “Wow, these headphones sound much brighter than I remember! There must be something wrong with them…”

As to not write them off as broken straight away, I tried listening to them through Sonarworks’ Headphone Calibration software. To my surprise, they sounded incredible and very well balanced as a result.

Check out the average frequency response of the Sony MDR-7506’s as determined by Sonarworks in the graph below:

sony mdr 7506

The Verdict?

Does this mean that they are bad headphones? Not necessarily. It simply means that they might be better suited to some tasks than others.

The prominent high-end boost and low-mid scoop of the Sony’s actually make a lot of sense in a live performance or studio tracking situation (similar to how I was using them in the past). These EQ moves can really improve the sound of raw instruments from the get-go. They help provide a vaguely “ready mixed” monitoring solution for the performer.

However, if the Sony’s were to be used as a primary mixing solution in the studio  without any calibration, our mixes would exhibit a bunch of pretty serious issues on other systems:

  • The huge boosts between 4-10kHz would cause us to compensate and mix very treble-light, resulting in dark mixes with reduced clarity.
  • The steep high-frequency roll-off beyond 10kHz may lead us into thinking our guitars and cymbals are fizz-free, when in reality they aren’t.
  • The large boost in the 2-4kHz presence region may cause us to “over-scoop” the harshness out of our overheads and distorted guitars, or think our drum shells and vocals are more present than they are in reality.
  • The low-end roll-off starting at 60Hz will lead us to mix sub-heavy, resulting in a boomy mix and problems during the mastering stage.

This list could go on longer, but I think you get the point…

Long story short: The severity of these boosts and cuts will vary greatly depending on the brand and price-point, but most headphones will suffer from similar issues to a certain extent. If you’re ever going to be mixing through headphones, I’d highly recommend doing some research on their shortcomings before doing so.

What about mixing on monitors?

Although a little more complex, the same principles also apply to mixing on monitors, with the added variable of the studio environment. Unless your room has been acoustically treated with panels, traps, diffusers and possibly some calibration software, then you can expect that you’re mixes will sound drastically different when taken out of it

Note: I won’t go into room acoustic treatment in this Blog, as it’s a very detailed topic which deserves a write-up of it’s own. Stay tuned for a URM room treatment guide at some point in the future!

Mixing To Your Monitoring/Room Conclusion:

If you’re unable to spend the time and/or money on optimising your monitoring, make sure you’re at least referencing your material on multiple systems. Don’t rely solely on a single representation.

INVEST IN YOUR MONITORING!

You’ll be surprised to see the difference it makes when you’re not having to constantly fight against your equipment to produce a good mix.

FINAL WORDS:

This concludes  Volume 1 of my  “Common Mixing Mistakes” series of Blogs. I hope that this article has given you some new ideas to try out during your next project. Be sure to let me know in the comment section below if any of this information has helped you out, or if you have any further questions regarding anything I’ve talked about here.

Stay tuned for Volume 2 of “Common Mixing Mistakes” and more production/mixing related articles in the not-so-distant future!


Want mix tips from URM Academy? Read them here!

Nail The MixNail The Mix is our online mixing school that gives you REAL multi-tracks from REAL bands, plus a mixing class from the producer who recorded it. Past guests include Periphery, Chelsea Grin, Machine Head and State Champs. Join now for instant access!